Home AI Trading Strategies / Low-Volatility Anomaly

Low-Volatility Anomaly Trading Strategy Analysis

Analyze low-volatility stocks and build risk-adjusted portfolios with Sourcetable AI. Calculate beta, volatility metrics, and returns automatically—no complex formulas required.

Andrew Grosser

Andrew Grosser

February 24, 2026 • 15 min read

Introduction

January 2024: SPLV (S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF) has annualized 10.1% over 5 years vs SPX at 15.4%. But SPLV's max drawdown of -28% vs SPX -34% means better risk-adjusted returns. The low-volatility anomaly challenges one of finance's fundamental principles: that higher risk should deliver higher returns. Academic research spanning decades shows that low-volatility stocks consistently outperform high-volatility stocks on a risk-adjusted basis, and often on an absolute basis too. This counterintuitive finding has created opportunities for portfolio managers, traders, and institutional investors seeking better risk-adjusted returns.

Traditional low-volatility analysis requires extensive data processing across hundreds or thousands of stocks. You need historical price data to calculate standard deviations, beta coefficients, Sharpe ratios, and rolling volatility metrics. Excel spreadsheets quickly become unwieldy with thousands of rows of daily prices, complex array formulas for covariance matrices, and manual data updates from multiple sources. Portfolio construction adds another layer—screening stocks by volatility quintiles, rebalancing calculations, and performance attribution analysis. Sourcetable handles all of this with natural language—sign up free.

Why Sourcetable for Low-Volatility Analysis

The low-volatility anomaly refers to the empirical observation that stocks with lower historical volatility tend to deliver higher risk-adjusted returns than high-volatility stocks. Research by Ang, Hodrick, Xing, and Zhang (2006) and Baker, Bradley, and Wurgler (2011) documented this phenomenon across multiple markets and time periods. A stock with 15% annual volatility might deliver 10% returns while a stock with 35% volatility delivers only 8% returns—contradicting the risk-return relationship predicted by traditional asset pricing models.

Several behavioral and structural factors explain this anomaly. Investors exhibit preference for lottery-like payoffs, driving up prices of volatile stocks. Leverage constraints prevent investors from achieving desired returns through low-volatility stocks, pushing them toward riskier alternatives. Benchmark-relative performance pressures cause fund managers to avoid low-volatility stocks that may underperform during bull markets. These persistent behavioral biases create opportunities for disciplined investors willing to embrace lower volatility.

Excel presents significant challenges for implementing this strategy. Calculating rolling volatility for 500 stocks over 5 years means processing 625,000 data points. Beta calculations require regression analysis for each stock against a market index. Constructing equal-weighted or volatility-weighted portfolios demands complex formulas that break when data updates. Rebalancing analysis requires tracking portfolio composition changes over time. Each calculation layer adds complexity and error risk.

Sourcetable eliminates these barriers with AI-powered analysis. The platform understands financial concepts like 'trailing 12-month volatility,' 'market beta,' and 'volatility quintiles' without requiring formula expertise. Upload your stock universe with price history and ask 'Calculate 252-day rolling standard deviation for all stocks.' The AI instantly processes the data and returns results. Ask 'Create a portfolio of the 50 lowest-volatility stocks' and Sourcetable identifies candidates, calculates portfolio metrics, and generates performance visualizations. This approach delivers professional-grade analysis accessible to analysts at any skill level.

The platform excels at comparative analysis essential for factor investing. Ask 'Compare returns of low-volatility quintile versus high-volatility quintile over past 5 years' and receive detailed performance attribution. Request 'Show correlation between volatility and subsequent returns' to validate the anomaly in your dataset. Generate Sharpe ratio comparisons, drawdown analysis, and sector exposures with simple questions. Sourcetable transforms exploratory analysis from a multi-day project into an interactive conversation with your data.

Benefits of Low-Volatility Analysis with Sourcetable

Low-volatility strategies offer compelling advantages for institutional and individual investors: better risk-adjusted returns, lower drawdowns during market stress, and psychological comfort during volatile periods. Sourcetable amplifies these benefits by making sophisticated analysis accessible and actionable.

Automated Risk Metric Calculations

Calculating volatility metrics manually consumes hours of analyst time. Standard deviation requires computing squared deviations from mean returns across 252 trading days. Beta calculations need regression analysis against market indices. Downside deviation focuses only on negative returns. Sourcetable's AI understands these concepts and calculates them instantly. Ask 'Calculate 1-year volatility for all stocks in my universe' and receive results in seconds. Request 'Show me stocks with beta under 0.7 and positive alpha' to identify defensive outperformers. The platform handles data aggregation, statistical calculations, and result formatting automatically.

  • Beta Calculation: Regress stock returns vs market returns over 60 months; low-vol stocks typically have beta 0.5–0.7 vs the 1.0 market beta; the anomaly is that these stocks earn higher risk-adjusted returns than CAPM predicts.
  • Idiosyncratic vs. Systematic Risk: Low-vol factor targets low total volatility (both market beta and company-specific risk); an alternative construction targets only low beta—the two approaches select different stocks with different factor loadings.
  • Realized vs. Forecast Vol: Sort on trailing 12-month realized vol; a stock with 15% realized vol over the past year tends to have 14–16% forward vol; sorting on realized vol is a strong predictor of future vol due to high vol persistence.
  • Volatility Regime: Low-vol stocks outperform in bear markets (2000–2002: -8% vs -46%; 2008: -22% vs -38%) and underperform in strong bull markets; the factor's value is in the downside protection rather than upside capture.

Dynamic Portfolio Construction

Building a low-volatility portfolio involves ranking stocks by volatility metrics, applying screens for liquidity and quality, and determining position weights. Traditional approaches require multiple spreadsheet tabs with complex lookups and conditional logic. Sourcetable simplifies this dramatically. Upload your equity universe and ask 'Create an equal-weighted portfolio of the 30 stocks with lowest 6-month volatility, excluding stocks under $10.' The AI applies your criteria, constructs the portfolio, and calculates aggregate metrics like portfolio beta, weighted average volatility, and sector exposures. Modify criteria by asking follow-up questions—'Now exclude financials and show me the results'—and see updated portfolios instantly.

  • Ranking and Selection: Sort S&P 500 by trailing 12-month volatility; select bottom quintile (100 stocks) weighted by inverse volatility; SPLV methodology rebalances quarterly, replacing high-vol stocks that entered the bottom quintile with those that exited.
  • Sector Concentration Risk: Low-vol stocks cluster in utilities, consumer staples, and healthcare; a pure low-vol sort produces a portfolio with 30%+ in utilities—adding sector neutralization limits max sector weight to 15%, reducing concentration at the cost of some volatility reduction.
  • Value vs. Low-Vol: Low-vol stocks are often growth or quality stocks with high P/E ratios; combining with value factor (low P/B, P/E) produces a portfolio with lower valuations and stronger performance during value rotations—factor combination reduces individual factor cycle risk.
  • Factor Timing: Low-vol factor underperforms in momentum-driven markets (2017, 2020 tech rally) when high-beta growth stocks lead; tracking the spread between high-beta and low-vol performance helps time factor tilt adjustments.

Historical Performance Analysis

Validating the low-volatility anomaly requires backtesting across market cycles. You need to sort stocks into volatility quintiles monthly, calculate returns for each quintile, and track performance over years. Excel backtests demand complex date logic, dynamic ranges, and careful handling of survivorship bias. Sourcetable makes this straightforward with natural language queries. Ask 'Backtest a strategy that goes long the lowest volatility quintile and short the highest volatility quintile, rebalanced quarterly from 2015 to 2023' and receive comprehensive results. The AI handles portfolio formation dates, return calculations, transaction costs, and performance metrics. Request 'Show me annual returns by quintile' or 'Calculate maximum drawdown for each volatility group' to understand strategy characteristics.

  • Long-Term Evidence: Haugen and Heins (1972) first documented the low-risk anomaly; 50+ years of evidence across US, international, and emerging markets confirms the pattern; it's one of the most robust risk factors in academic finance.
  • Explanation Theories: Behavioral (investor preference for lottery-like high-vol stocks); institutional (benchmarking constraints prevent managers from overweighting low-beta stocks); leverage constraints (investors who can't use leverage prefer high-beta stocks for return enhancement).
  • Capacity Constraints: Unlike momentum, the low-vol factor trades slowly (quarterly rebalancing) and concentrates in liquid large-caps; capacity is estimated at $100–200B before significant alpha decay—well above current institutional allocation.
  • Crisis Alpha: During the top 10 worst S&P 500 months since 1990, low-vol stocks outperformed by average 3.8%; this defensive characteristic is worth 0–1% annual drag in normal markets in exchange for the downside protection.

Real-Time Monitoring and Alerts

Low-volatility portfolios require ongoing monitoring as market conditions change. A stock with historically low volatility might experience a regime shift. Portfolio rebalancing becomes necessary when volatility rankings change significantly. Sourcetable enables continuous monitoring through natural language queries. Ask 'Which portfolio holdings have seen volatility increase by more than 50% in the past month?' to identify stocks requiring attention. Request 'Show me stocks that have moved from the lowest volatility quintile to higher quintiles' to spot candidates for replacement. The platform updates calculations automatically as new price data arrives, keeping your analysis current without manual data refreshes.

Comprehensive Visualization Capabilities

Understanding volatility patterns requires visual analysis—distributions, time series, and scatter plots showing volatility-return relationships. Creating these in Excel means wrestling with chart formatting, data ranges, and manual updates. Sourcetable generates professional visualizations through simple requests. Ask 'Create a histogram showing volatility distribution across my stock universe' and receive a formatted chart instantly. Request 'Plot 12-month returns versus 12-month volatility for all stocks' to visualize the anomaly. Generate 'rolling 60-day volatility time series for my portfolio versus the S&P 500' to track relative risk. Each visualization updates automatically as underlying data changes.

Factor Combination Analysis

Sophisticated investors combine low-volatility with other factors like value, quality, or momentum. This requires multi-dimensional screening and performance attribution. Ask Sourcetable 'Show me stocks in the lowest volatility quartile that also have P/E ratios under 15 and positive 6-month momentum' to identify stocks meeting multiple criteria. Request 'Compare returns of low-volatility stocks with high profitability versus low-volatility stocks with low profitability' to understand factor interactions. The AI handles complex Boolean logic and multi-factor sorting that would require extensive Excel formula work.

How Low-Volatility Analysis Works in Sourcetable

Implementing a low-volatility strategy in Sourcetable follows a streamlined workflow that transforms complex quantitative analysis into conversational queries. The platform handles data processing, statistical calculations, and portfolio construction through natural language interaction.

Step 1: Import Your Equity Universe

Start by uploading historical price data for your stock universe. This might be the S&P 500, Russell 2000, or a custom list of stocks you're tracking. Your data should include daily closing prices, dates, and ticker symbols. Sourcetable accepts CSV files, Excel workbooks, or direct connections to financial data providers. The platform automatically recognizes date formats, identifies price columns, and structures data for analysis. If you have additional data like market cap, sector classifications, or fundamental metrics, include those columns—Sourcetable will incorporate them into your analysis workflow.

  • Start by uploading historical price data for your stock universe.

Step 2: Calculate Volatility Metrics

Once data is loaded, ask Sourcetable to calculate volatility metrics. Type 'Calculate 252-day standard deviation of returns for all stocks' and the AI processes daily returns, computes standard deviations, and annualizes results. Request 'Show me 30-day, 90-day, and 252-day volatility for each stock' to compare short-term versus long-term volatility patterns. Ask for 'realized volatility over the past year' or 'rolling 60-day volatility' depending on your strategy timeframe. The platform handles return calculations, statistical formulas, and result formatting automatically. For more sophisticated analysis, request 'Calculate downside deviation using 0% as the threshold' to focus on negative volatility, or ask for 'semi-variance' to measure downside risk specifically.

Step 3: Rank and Screen Stocks

With volatility metrics calculated, identify low-volatility candidates through screening queries. Ask 'Show me the 50 stocks with lowest 12-month volatility' to see top candidates. Apply additional filters: 'Which stocks have volatility below 15% and average daily volume above 1 million shares?' ensures you're selecting liquid, low-volatility names. Request 'Create volatility quintiles and show me all stocks in the lowest quintile' to implement a systematic factor approach. Sourcetable ranks stocks, applies your criteria, and returns filtered results instantly. Combine multiple factors by asking 'Show me stocks in the lowest volatility decile that also have positive earnings growth and market cap above $5 billion' for quality-focused low-vol selection.

  • "Show me the 50 stocks with lowest 12-month volatility"
  • "re selecting liquid, low-volatility names. Request "

Step 4: Construct Your Portfolio

Portfolio construction translates your screening results into position weights and allocations. Ask Sourcetable 'Create an equal-weighted portfolio from the 40 lowest-volatility stocks' and the AI assigns 2.5% to each position. For volatility-weighted approaches, request 'Create a portfolio weighted inversely to volatility' so lower-volatility stocks receive larger allocations. Apply sector constraints: 'Build a low-volatility portfolio with maximum 25% in any single sector' to maintain diversification. The platform calculates portfolio-level metrics automatically—aggregate volatility, weighted average beta, sector exposures, and concentration measures. Ask 'What is my portfolio's expected volatility?' and Sourcetable computes it using the covariance matrix of constituent stocks.

Step 5: Backtest Strategy Performance

Validate your approach through historical analysis. Ask 'Backtest a strategy that rebalances quarterly to the lowest volatility quintile from January 2015 to December 2023' and Sourcetable simulates the strategy across the full period. The AI handles formation dates, calculates returns for each rebalancing period, compounds results, and produces cumulative performance. Request 'Compare my low-volatility strategy returns versus the S&P 500' to see relative performance. Ask for 'annual returns, Sharpe ratio, maximum drawdown, and win rate' to evaluate risk-adjusted performance comprehensively. Generate 'rolling 12-month returns' to visualize performance consistency. The platform manages complex date logic, survivorship bias adjustments, and return calculations that would require extensive Excel programming.

Step 6: Monitor and Rebalance

Low-volatility strategies require periodic rebalancing as volatility rankings change. Ask Sourcetable 'Which current holdings are no longer in the lowest volatility quintile?' to identify candidates for replacement. Request 'Show me the 10 lowest-volatility stocks not currently in my portfolio' to find new additions. Calculate turnover implications: 'If I rebalance to the current lowest-volatility 50 stocks, what percentage of my portfolio turns over?' helps estimate transaction costs. The platform tracks portfolio composition over time, making rebalancing analysis straightforward. Set up regular monitoring by asking 'Has portfolio volatility increased by more than 20% from the initial level?' to trigger rebalancing reviews.

Step 7: Generate Reports and Visualizations

Communicate your analysis through charts and reports. Ask 'Create a scatter plot of volatility versus returns for all stocks' to visualize the low-volatility anomaly in your data. Request 'Generate a time series chart comparing my portfolio volatility to market volatility' to show defensive characteristics. Ask for 'a table showing portfolio performance statistics by year' for detailed reporting. Sourcetable creates professional visualizations and formatted tables instantly, ready for presentations or investment committee reviews. Export results to PDF or PowerPoint by asking 'Export my analysis to a presentation format' for seamless reporting workflows.

Low-Volatility Strategy Use Cases

Low-volatility strategies serve diverse investment objectives across institutional and individual portfolios. Sourcetable enables each application through AI-powered analysis that adapts to specific requirements.

Defensive Equity Portfolio Management

Portfolio managers seeking equity exposure with reduced drawdown risk use low-volatility strategies as core defensive holdings. A pension fund might allocate 30% of its equity portfolio to low-volatility stocks to reduce overall portfolio volatility while maintaining equity market participation. Using Sourcetable, the portfolio manager uploads the fund's investable universe—say the Russell 1000—and asks 'Identify the 100 stocks with lowest 3-year volatility and beta under 0.85.' The AI screens candidates and calculates portfolio characteristics. The manager then requests 'Construct a portfolio that targets 12% annual volatility with maximum 20% allocation to any sector' and Sourcetable optimizes weights accordingly. Monthly monitoring involves asking 'Which holdings have experienced volatility spikes above 25% annualized?' to identify stocks requiring review. This approach delivered portfolios with 15-20% lower volatility than broad markets while capturing 80-90% of upside during the 2010-2020 period, according to MSCI minimum volatility index data.

Factor-Based Quantitative Research

Quantitative researchers validate factor premiums and develop multi-factor strategies combining low-volatility with other characteristics. An analyst investigating whether the low-volatility anomaly persists across market conditions uses Sourcetable to conduct comprehensive analysis. They upload 20 years of daily price data for the S&P 500 constituents and ask 'Create volatility deciles rebalanced monthly and calculate returns for each decile.' The AI produces a complete return series for all deciles. The researcher then asks 'Show me the performance of the lowest volatility decile during months when the market declined more than 5%' to understand defensive characteristics. They request 'Calculate the Fama-French three-factor alpha for the low-volatility portfolio' to determine if excess returns persist after controlling for market, size, and value factors. Follow-up queries like 'Does combining low volatility with high profitability improve Sharpe ratios?' enable rapid hypothesis testing. This research workflow—which might take weeks in Excel with complex array formulas and VBA scripts—completes in hours through conversational analysis.

Risk Parity and Volatility Targeting

Risk parity strategies allocate capital based on risk contribution rather than dollar amounts, requiring precise volatility measurement and forecasting. A multi-asset portfolio manager implementing risk parity needs each asset class to contribute equally to portfolio risk. For the equity sleeve, this means identifying low-volatility stocks that can be levered to target specific risk levels. The manager asks Sourcetable 'Calculate the 60-day realized volatility and 90-day volatility forecast for all holdings' to get current and expected risk metrics. They then request 'Size positions so each stock contributes 2% to portfolio volatility' and Sourcetable calculates appropriate weights using the covariance matrix. When market volatility changes, the manager asks 'Rescale positions to maintain 15% portfolio volatility target given current realized volatilities' and receives updated allocations. This dynamic volatility targeting—essential for risk parity but mathematically complex—becomes manageable through AI-powered position sizing that updates as market conditions evolve.

Retirement Portfolio Construction

Individual investors approaching or in retirement prioritize capital preservation while maintaining growth potential. A 60-year-old investor with a $2 million portfolio wants equity exposure without the stress of 30-40% drawdowns during bear markets. They use Sourcetable to build a low-volatility equity allocation by uploading a list of large-cap dividend stocks and asking 'Which 25 stocks have the lowest 5-year volatility and dividend yields above 2.5%?' The AI identifies candidates combining low volatility with income. The investor asks 'Create a portfolio with these stocks weighted by market cap, and show me historical drawdowns compared to the S&P 500.' Sourcetable reveals that while the S&P 500 experienced a 34% drawdown in 2020, the low-volatility portfolio declined only 21%—a meaningful difference for retirees withdrawing funds. The investor sets up quarterly reviews by asking 'Compare my portfolio volatility to its 3-year average and alert me if it increases by more than 30%' to maintain the defensive characteristics over time.

Long-Short Factor Portfolio Construction

Hedge funds and sophisticated investors implement long-short strategies to isolate factor premiums and achieve market-neutral returns. A quantitative hedge fund creates a volatility factor portfolio by going long low-volatility stocks and short high-volatility stocks. Using Sourcetable, the analyst uploads their stock universe and asks 'Create quintiles based on 12-month realized volatility and show me the stocks in the top and bottom quintiles.' The AI identifies both extremes. The analyst then requests 'Construct a dollar-neutral portfolio: long $10 million of the lowest volatility quintile and short $10 million of the highest volatility quintile, both equal-weighted.' Sourcetable calculates positions and portfolio characteristics. To assess market neutrality, the analyst asks 'What is the portfolio's net beta and sector exposures?' and receives confirmation that the portfolio has near-zero market exposure. Monthly performance attribution involves asking 'Decompose returns into long leg performance, short leg performance, and financing costs' to understand return drivers. This type of sophisticated long-short implementation—requiring careful position tracking and risk management—becomes accessible through natural language portfolio construction.

Frequently Asked Questions

If your question is not covered here, you can contact our team.

Contact Us
What is the betting against beta (BAB) factor and how does it exploit the low-vol anomaly?
The BAB factor (Frazzini & Pedersen, 2014) goes long low-beta stocks and short high-beta stocks, both leveraged to market beta of 1.0. Long: $2 of low-beta stocks (beta 0.5) funded with $1. Short: $0.5 of high-beta stocks (beta 2.0). Net market exposure: (2 × 0.5) - (0.5 × 2.0) = 0. This market-neutral construction generated 0.7% monthly alpha (8.4% annual) in the US from 1926-2012. The anomaly exists because leverage-constrained investors (mutual funds with 1:1 mandate) overpay for high-beta stocks to amplify returns, suppressing their risk-adjusted performance.
Why do low-volatility stocks outperform high-volatility stocks on a risk-adjusted basis?
CAPM predicts higher risk = higher return. The empirical reality: high-volatility stocks consistently underperform low-volatility stocks on both absolute and risk-adjusted bases. Explanations: (1) Leverage constraints—institutional investors can't lever low-beta stocks, so they buy high-beta as a substitute, bidding prices up and suppressing future returns. (2) Lottery preference—retail investors speculate in high-volatility stocks like lottery tickets, overpaying for the chance at large gains. (3) Benchmarking—managers compensated on alpha vs benchmark may prefer high-beta stocks that amplify benchmark movements. The result: low-vol stocks are persistently underowned and undervalued.
How large is the low-volatility premium historically?
MSCI Minimum Volatility Index vs MSCI World (1988-2023): minimum volatility generated 10.2% annual return vs 9.3% for broad market, with 11.8% annualized volatility vs 15.2% for market. Sharpe ratio: 0.55 vs 0.38—a 45% improvement in risk efficiency. The US version (USMV ETF): since inception 2011 through 2023, outperformed MSCI USA by 0.8% annually with 25% less volatility. The premium is particularly strong in emerging markets (1-2% annual over broad EM) because leverage constraints are most binding in those markets.
Which sectors tend to have the lowest beta stocks for minimum volatility portfolios?
Lowest-beta sectors (typical 5-year betas, 2019-2024): Utilities (beta 0.5-0.7), Consumer Staples (0.5-0.7), Healthcare (0.7-0.9), Real Estate REITs (0.7-0.9). Highest-beta sectors: Technology (1.2-1.5), Energy (1.0-1.4), Financials (1.0-1.3), Consumer Discretionary (1.1-1.3). Minimum volatility portfolios heavily overweight defensive sectors relative to market-cap benchmarks—often 2-3x the weight in utilities and staples vs the S&P 500. This sector tilt means min-vol strategies underperform significantly during technology-led bull markets (2019, 2023) and outperform during bear markets (2008, 2022).
How do you construct a minimum variance portfolio vs a minimum volatility factor portfolio?
Minimum variance (MV): mathematical optimization—minimize portfolio variance subject to constraints (long only, sector limits, turnover limits). Requires a covariance matrix estimate, which is unstable with limited history. Minimum volatility factor: rank stocks by trailing 21-day or 252-day volatility, buy bottom quintile, equal-weight or inverse-volatility weight. Simpler but ignores correlations. Performance: MV theoretically better; in practice the two approaches have similar Sharpe ratios because covariance matrix estimation error undermines MV's theoretical advantage. Minimum volatility factor has lower turnover (50% annual vs 100-150% for MV) and lower implementation costs.
Does the low-volatility anomaly work in fixed income and other asset classes?
The low-vol anomaly extends across asset classes: (1) Fixed income: shorter-duration bonds outperform on a risk-adjusted basis vs longer-duration bonds in most historical periods—the term premium doesn't fully compensate for duration risk. (2) Currencies: low-volatility currencies outperform high-volatility ones on a risk-adjusted basis (related to carry trade). (3) Commodities: low-volatility commodity futures outperform high-volatility futures risk-adjusted. (4) Options: selling high-implied-volatility options (short vol positions) outperforms on risk-adjusted basis because implied vol exceeds realized vol on average. The pervasiveness suggests a systematic behavioral or constraints-based explanation rather than data mining.
How does the low-vol factor behave during market crashes?
The low-vol factor's primary value is defensive: during S&P 500 drawdowns of >15%, minimum volatility portfolios historically lose 8-12% while the market loses 15-25%. In 2008, MSCI Min Vol fell approximately 27% vs S&P 500's 38.5% decline. In March 2020, min vol fell 30% vs market's 34% drop—smaller relative advantage than expected due to sector rotation and liquidity effects. The 2022 rising rate environment: min vol fell only 11% vs market's 18%—sector tilt toward defensive staples/utilities provided protection. Best performance: early-cycle recoveries where defensive stocks lag. Most vulnerable: momentum-driven growth bull markets.
Andrew Grosser

Andrew Grosser

Founder, CTO @ Sourcetable

Sourcetable is the AI-powered spreadsheet that helps traders, analysts, and finance teams hypothesize, evaluate, validate, and iterate on trading strategies without writing code.

Share this article

Sourcetable Logo
Ready to implement the Low Volatility Anomaly strategy?

Backtest, validate, and execute the Low Volatility Anomaly strategy with AI. No coding required.

Drop CSV