Picture this: You're staring at a dataset, wondering if that 3% difference you're seeing is real or just statistical noise. Sound familiar? Every statistician, researcher, and analyst has been there. The difference between meaningful results and random variation can make or break your research, your business decisions, or your career.
Statistical significance testing is like being a detective – you gather evidence, test theories, and draw conclusions. But unlike detective work, the stakes are mathematical, and the clues are hidden in p-values
, confidence intervals
, and test statistics
.
Move beyond manual calculations and embrace AI-powered statistical analysis that adapts to your research needs.
AI analyzes your data structure and research question to recommend the appropriate statistical test – from t-tests to ANOVA to chi-square analysis.
Get plain-English explanations of your statistical results, including effect sizes, confidence intervals, and practical significance alongside statistical significance.
Automatically verify test assumptions like normality, homogeneity of variance, and independence – with suggestions for alternatives when assumptions are violated.
Generate publication-ready plots including distribution curves, confidence intervals, and effect size visualizations that bring your statistical results to life.
Calculate required sample sizes before data collection and assess the power of your completed analyses to ensure meaningful conclusions.
Automatically apply Bonferroni, FDR, or other correction methods when conducting multiple tests, preventing inflated Type I error rates.
A marketing team wants to test whether a new email subject line increases open rates. They have 10,000 subscribers and randomly assign 5,000 to receive the original subject line (Control: 22% open rate) and 5,000 to receive the new version (Treatment: 24% open rate).
In Sourcetable, you'd simply input your data and ask: "Is the 2% difference in open rates statistically significant?" The AI would automatically:
Researchers are evaluating a new treatment's effectiveness compared to a standard therapy. They measure patient recovery times: Control group (n=150) has a mean recovery time of 12.3 days (SD=3.2), while the treatment group (n=145) averages 10.8 days (SD=2.9).
Sourcetable would guide you through:
A production manager notices that defect rates seem higher on Monday mornings. They collect data for 12 weeks, comparing Monday morning defect rates (3.2%) to the rest of the week (2.1%).
The analysis would include:
From hypothesis formation to result interpretation, Sourcetable guides you through each step of rigorous statistical analysis.
Start by clearly stating your null and alternative hypotheses. Sourcetable helps you formulate testable questions and identifies the type of comparison you're making (one-sample, two-sample, paired, etc.).
Upload your data and let AI detect data types, identify outliers, and suggest data cleaning steps. Visualize distributions and relationships before testing begins.
Based on your data structure and research question, get automatic recommendations for appropriate tests. Check assumptions with built-in diagnostic tools and receive alternatives when assumptions are violated.
Run your statistical tests with one click. Get comprehensive results including test statistics, p-values, effect sizes, confidence intervals, and plain-English interpretations of what your results mean.
Generate publication-ready visualizations and automated summaries. Export results in multiple formats for presentations, reports, or further analysis.
See how professionals use statistical significance testing to make data-driven decisions in their respective fields.
Psychology researchers comparing intervention effectiveness, education researchers analyzing teaching method impacts, and social scientists testing theoretical predictions with rigorous hypothesis testing protocols.
Pharmaceutical companies testing drug efficacy, hospitals comparing treatment outcomes, and public health officials analyzing intervention effectiveness with appropriate statistical controls.
Marketing teams optimizing campaign performance, product managers testing feature adoption, and operations teams analyzing process improvements through controlled experimentation.
Manufacturing engineers monitoring process control, software teams analyzing bug rates across releases, and service organizations comparing performance metrics before and after changes.
Investment analysts testing portfolio strategies, risk managers comparing model performance, and economists analyzing policy impacts with statistical rigor.
Performance analysts comparing training methods, coaches evaluating strategy effectiveness, and sports scientists analyzing player performance metrics across different conditions.
Sourcetable supports the full spectrum of statistical significance tests, automatically selecting and configuring the right approach for your data:
Statistical significance indicates that your results are unlikely due to chance (typically p < 0.05), while practical significance considers whether the difference is meaningful in real-world terms. A difference can be statistically significant but practically trivial, especially with large sample sizes. Sourcetable helps you evaluate both by calculating effect sizes and confidence intervals alongside p-values.
The choice depends on your data type (continuous vs. categorical), number of groups being compared, whether observations are independent or paired, and whether your data meets parametric test assumptions. Sourcetable's AI analyzes your data structure and research question to automatically recommend appropriate tests, including non-parametric alternatives when assumptions are violated.
Common solutions include data transformation (log, square root), using non-parametric alternatives (Mann-Whitney instead of t-test), or robust statistical methods. Sourcetable automatically checks assumptions and suggests alternatives, such as Welch's t-test for unequal variances or non-parametric tests for non-normal distributions.
When conducting multiple statistical tests, you increase the risk of Type I errors (false positives). Apply corrections like Bonferroni (conservative), False Discovery Rate (FDR), or Holm-Bonferroni methods. Sourcetable automatically detects multiple comparison scenarios and applies appropriate corrections while explaining the trade-offs between different methods.
Sample size depends on the effect size you want to detect, desired statistical power (typically 80%), and significance level (typically 0.05). Larger effects require smaller samples, while small effects need larger samples for detection. Sourcetable includes power analysis tools to calculate required sample sizes before data collection and assess the power of completed analyses.
Yes, but the approach depends on how you treat Likert scale data. Individual Likert items are often analyzed with non-parametric tests (Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis), while Likert scale sums or means from multiple items can sometimes be treated as continuous data for parametric tests. Sourcetable helps you choose appropriate methods based on your scale structure and research questions.
If you question is not covered here, you can contact our team.
Contact Us