Quality control isn't just about catching bad products—it's about understanding your processes so well that you prevent problems before they happen. Statistical analysis is your secret weapon, but traditional tools make it feel like rocket science.
With Sourcetable's statistical analysis capabilities, quality professionals can finally focus on what matters: improving processes and delighting customers. No more wrestling with complex formulas or hunting for the right chart type.
Generate X-bar, R-charts, and process capability studies with a simple AI prompt. No need to remember complex formulas or chart setups.
Connect live data feeds and get alerts when processes drift out of control. Catch issues before they become customer complaints.
Generate comprehensive quality reports that update automatically. Perfect for ISO audits, management reviews, and continuous improvement initiatives.
Calculate Cp, Cpk, and other capability indices effortlessly. Understand your process performance at a glance.
Use correlation analysis and regression tools to identify the real drivers of quality issues. Stop treating symptoms and fix the source.
Built-in templates for common quality standards. Generate audit-ready documentation with confidence.
See how quality professionals use statistical analysis to solve real problems
A electronics manufacturer tracks defect rates across multiple production lines. Using control charts, they identified that Line 3 had increasing variability every Tuesday morning. Root cause? The weekend maintenance schedule wasn't allowing proper machine warm-up time. Simple fix, massive impact on quality.
A automotive parts company receives components from 12 different suppliers. By analyzing incoming inspection data with capability studies, they discovered that Supplier J consistently delivered parts with Cpk values below 1.33. This triggered a supplier development program that improved quality by 40%.
Before launching a new pharmaceutical product, the quality team ran process capability studies on the filling line. The analysis showed the process could achieve the required accuracy, but only if they controlled room temperature within ±2°C. This insight prevented costly recalls later.
A food manufacturer was seeing sporadic customer complaints about taste. Statistical analysis revealed complaints spiked during specific weather patterns. Investigation showed humidity was affecting ingredient storage. Installing climate control reduced complaints by 75%.
From data to decisions in minutes, not hours
Import from inspection systems, PLCs, lab equipment, or manual entry forms. Sourcetable handles any data format and automatically organizes it for analysis.
"Show me control charts for Line 2 this week" or "Calculate process capability for dimension X." Our AI understands quality terminology and creates the right analysis.
Receive clear visualizations, statistical summaries, and recommendations. Share results with teams or stakeholders with one click.
Statistical Process Control (SPC) is the backbone of modern quality management. X-bar and R charts
monitor process centering and variation, while p-charts
and c-charts
track defect rates and counts.
Sourcetable automatically calculates control limits using the appropriate formulas—no need to remember whether to use A2, D3, or D4 factors. Just specify your data and get professional-grade control charts.
Understanding what your process can do versus what it should do is critical. Capability indices like Cp
, Cpk
, Pp
, and Ppk
quantify this relationship.
Before analyzing process data, you need confidence in your measurement system. Gage R&R studies
separate measurement variation from actual process variation.
Sourcetable guides you through proper MSA setup and automatically calculates %R&R, number of distinct categories, and measurement system adequacy.
When you need to optimize multiple process parameters simultaneously, Design of Experiments provides a systematic approach. Whether it's a simple 2^k factorial or a more complex response surface methodology, Sourcetable helps you design, execute, and analyze experiments efficiently.
Modern processes have dozens of quality characteristics that interact with each other. Hotelling's T² charts
and Principal Component Analysis
help monitor multivariate processes without the complexity of managing individual control charts for each variable.
Understanding failure patterns is crucial for quality improvement. Weibull analysis
, survival curves
, and accelerated life testing
help predict product lifetimes and optimize maintenance schedules.
Example: A bearing manufacturer uses Weibull analysis to predict failure rates under different load conditions. This data helps customers plan maintenance schedules and prevents unexpected equipment failures.
FDA validation requirements demand rigorous statistical documentation. Track Critical Quality Attributes (CQAs), validate analytical methods, and maintain continuous process verification with automated reporting that meets 21 CFR Part 11 requirements.
IATF 16949 compliance requires sophisticated statistical methods. Monitor key characteristics with control charts, conduct process capability studies for PPAP submissions, and maintain statistical evidence for customer quality requirements.
HACCP plans rely on statistical monitoring of Critical Control Points. Track temperatures, pH levels, microbial counts, and other safety parameters with automated alerts when processes drift out of specification.
AS9100 standards demand zero-defect manufacturing. Use acceptance sampling plans, qualification testing analysis, and reliability studies to ensure products meet stringent safety and performance requirements.
ISO 13485 compliance requires risk-based quality management. Monitor manufacturing processes with statistical control, validate cleaning procedures, and maintain device history records with full traceability.
High-volume production demands efficient quality systems. Track solder joint integrity, component placement accuracy, and electrical test results across multiple production lines with real-time dashboards.
A process is in statistical control when it exhibits only common cause variation—no patterns, trends, or points outside control limits. Look for: no points beyond 3-sigma limits, no runs of 7+ consecutive points on one side of centerline, no trends of 7+ consecutive increasing/decreasing points, and no patterns that suggest special causes.
Cp measures process potential—how capable your process would be if perfectly centered. Cpk accounts for actual process centering. If your process is perfectly centered, Cp = Cpk. If off-center, Cpk will be lower than Cp. For quality management, Cpk is more important because it reflects real-world capability.
For variables control charts (X-bar/R), start with at least 20-25 subgroups of 4-5 measurements each. For attribute charts (p, np, c, u), you need enough data so the average number of defects per sample is at least 5. More data gives better control limit estimates, but you can start monitoring with initial limits and revise as you collect more data.
Recalculate control limits when: you've made intentional process improvements, you've collected 25+ new subgroups since the last calculation, the process has fundamentally changed (new equipment, materials, methods), or when conducting periodic reviews (quarterly/annually). Never recalculate just because you have out-of-control points—investigate and fix the special causes first.
Yes, but traditional Shewhart charts may not be suitable. Consider: pre-control charts for quick setup verification, short-run SPC techniques that standardize different products, CUSUM or EWMA charts that are more sensitive to small shifts, or individual-X charts when you can't form rational subgroups.
First, try to identify and eliminate special causes that create non-normality. If the data remains non-normal: use Box-Cox transformation to normalize the data, apply non-parametric capability indices, use percentile-based capability metrics, or consider that some processes are naturally non-normal (like cycle times) and use appropriate distributions.
Industry standards vary: automotive typically requires Cpk ≥ 1.33 for production, aerospace often demands Cpk ≥ 1.67 for critical characteristics, pharmaceuticals may require Cpk ≥ 1.0 with additional controls, and Six Sigma targets correspond to Cpk ≥ 2.0. Always check your customer requirements and industry standards.
Update control charts in real-time if possible, but at minimum: plot new points daily for critical processes, weekly for stable processes, immediately when special causes are detected and corrected, and review/revise control limits monthly or quarterly based on process stability and improvement activities.
If you question is not covered here, you can contact our team.
Contact Us