Remember that moment when you first encountered a p-value? The confusion, the uncertainty, the nagging question: "What does this actually mean?" You're not alone. Statistical hypothesis testing is where data meets decision-making, where numbers transform into insights that can change everything.
Whether you're comparing treatment effects in clinical trials, analyzing customer behavior patterns, or validating research hypotheses, advanced statistical hypothesis testing is your gateway to scientific rigor. With Sourcetable's AI-powered analysis, you can perform complex statistical tests with the confidence of a seasoned statistician – no PhD required.
From basic t-tests to advanced multivariate analysis, Sourcetable handles the complexity while you focus on insights.
T-tests, ANOVA, regression analysis with automated assumption checking and effect size calculations
Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis, Wilcoxon tests when your data doesn't meet normal distribution assumptions
Independence testing, goodness-of-fit tests, and categorical data analysis with clear interpretations
Factorial ANOVA, repeated measures, ANCOVA with post-hoc testing and multiple comparisons
MANOVA, discriminant analysis, and complex experimental designs with automated reporting
Cohen's d, eta-squared, confidence intervals, and practical significance assessment
See how different industries leverage hypothesis testing to make data-driven decisions.
A pharmaceutical company needs to determine if their new drug is more effective than the current standard. Using a two-sample t-test with unequal variances, they compare treatment outcomes between 200 patients in each group. Sourcetable automatically checks normality assumptions, calculates effect sizes, and provides clinical significance interpretations alongside statistical significance.
An e-commerce platform wants to test whether a new checkout design increases conversion rates. With 10,000 users split between two versions, they use a chi-square test of independence to analyze the relationship between design version and purchase completion. The analysis reveals not just statistical significance but practical impact on revenue.
A manufacturing facility monitors product quality across three production lines. Using one-way ANOVA, they test whether defect rates differ significantly between lines. When assumptions aren't met, Sourcetable automatically suggests and performs the Kruskal-Wallis test, providing actionable insights for process improvement.
Researchers investigate whether teaching method affects student performance across different subject areas. A two-way ANOVA analyzes the interaction between teaching method and subject type, while controlling for prior achievement through ANCOVA. Complex post-hoc comparisons reveal which combinations work best.
From data exploration to final interpretation, here's how Sourcetable guides you through rigorous hypothesis testing.
Start with clear null and alternative hypotheses. Sourcetable helps you formulate testable statements and choose appropriate statistical tests based on your research questions and data structure.
Examine distributions, identify outliers, and check assumptions. Our AI automatically flags potential issues and suggests transformations or alternative tests when parametric assumptions aren't met.
Based on your data type, sample size, and research design, Sourcetable recommends the most powerful statistical test. Get guidance on when to use parametric vs. non-parametric approaches.
Run your chosen statistical test with automated assumption checking. Get comprehensive output including test statistics, p-values, effect sizes, and confidence intervals – all with clear explanations.
Move beyond p-values to understand practical significance. Sourcetable provides context-aware interpretations, helping you communicate findings to stakeholders who aren't statistics experts.
When your research questions get complex, you need sophisticated tools. Sourcetable's advanced statistical capabilities handle the mathematical complexity while keeping the insights accessible.
Running multiple tests? Don't fall into the multiple testing trap. Sourcetable automatically applies appropriate corrections like Bonferroni, Holm-Bonferroni, or FDR control methods. You'll get adjusted p-values and clear guidance on which comparisons remain significant after correction.
Avoid underpowered studies that waste resources or miss important effects. Before collecting data, use power analysis to determine optimal sample sizes. After analysis, assess whether non-significant results reflect true null effects or insufficient power to detect meaningful differences.
Real data is messy. When outliers, non-normality, or heteroscedasticity threaten your analysis, robust methods provide reliable results. Sourcetable offers bootstrap confidence intervals, robust regression techniques, and permutation tests that don't rely on distributional assumptions.
Even experienced analysts can stumble into statistical pitfalls. Here's how to navigate the most common challenges with confidence.
It's tempting to try different tests until you find significance. Resist this urge. Sourcetable encourages pre-registered analysis plans and transparent reporting of all tests performed. When you must conduct exploratory analysis, clearly distinguish it from confirmatory testing.
A p-value of 0.001 doesn't guarantee practical importance. With large sample sizes, tiny effects can be statistically significant but meaningless in practice. Always examine effect sizes, confidence intervals, and consider the real-world implications of your findings.
Parametric tests assume normality, equal variances, and independence. When these assumptions fail, your results become unreliable. Sourcetable automatically checks these assumptions and suggests appropriate alternatives when violations occur.
The choice depends on whether your data meets parametric assumptions. If your data is normally distributed with equal variances, parametric tests like t-tests and ANOVA are more powerful. If assumptions are violated, non-parametric alternatives like Mann-Whitney U or Kruskal-Wallis are more appropriate. Sourcetable automatically checks assumptions and recommends the best approach for your data.
Statistical significance (p < 0.05) indicates the result is unlikely due to chance, while practical significance measures whether the effect size is meaningful in real-world terms. A statistically significant result with a tiny effect size might not be practically important. Always consider both when interpreting results.
When performing multiple tests, the chance of false positives increases. Use correction methods like Bonferroni (conservative) or FDR control (less conservative but more powerful). Sourcetable automatically applies appropriate corrections and provides both original and adjusted p-values.
Sample size depends on effect size, desired power (usually 0.80), and significance level (usually 0.05). Larger effect sizes require smaller samples, while detecting small effects requires larger samples. Use power analysis before data collection to determine optimal sample sizes.
Yes, but choose appropriate methods. For non-normal data, use non-parametric tests (Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis), robust methods, or data transformations. Bootstrap methods can also provide reliable confidence intervals without distributional assumptions.
Interaction effects occur when the effect of one factor depends on the level of another factor. Significant interactions require careful interpretation through simple effects analysis and post-hoc comparisons. Sourcetable provides clear visualizations and automated post-hoc testing to help you understand complex interactions.
If you question is not covered here, you can contact our team.
Contact Us