In healthcare, the accuracy of diagnostic tests can mean the difference between timely treatment and missed diagnoses. Whether you're validating a new blood test, comparing imaging techniques, or evaluating screening protocols, statistical rigor is non-negotiable.
Traditional statistical software often requires extensive training, coding expertise, or expensive licenses. Sourcetable changes this by bringing AI-powered diagnostic test analysis directly into a familiar spreadsheet interface. Simply upload your data and let AI guide you through sensitivity analysis, specificity calculations, and ROC curve generation.
Generate sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV automatically from your confusion matrix data. No manual formula writing required.
Create publication-ready ROC curves with AUC calculations and confidence intervals. Export directly to presentations or publications.
Compare multiple diagnostic tests side-by-side with statistical significance testing and effect size calculations.
Get contextual recommendations for improving test performance and identifying optimal cutoff values.
Calculate likelihood ratios and post-test probabilities to inform clinical decision-making processes.
Generate reports that meet FDA and other regulatory standards for diagnostic test validation studies.
Import diagnostic test results from CSV files, lab systems, or enter manually. Sourcetable accepts any format including true/false positives and raw test values.
Set your gold standard reference, define positive/negative criteria, and specify confidence levels. AI suggests optimal settings based on your data characteristics.
Automatically calculate sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratios with confidence intervals.
Create ROC curves, forest plots, and summary tables. Export publication-ready figures and comprehensive statistical reports.
A hospital laboratory developed a new cardiac troponin assay and needs to validate its performance against the current gold standard. The study included 500 patients presenting with chest pain.
Sourcetable Analysis Results: Sensitivity: 77.3% (95% CI: 68.9-84.4%), Specificity: 96.9% (95% CI: 94.7-98.4%), PPV: 87.6%, NPV: 93.8%. The ROC curve showed an AUC of 0.932, indicating excellent diagnostic performance.
A radiology department compared three different MRI protocols for detecting brain lesions in multiple sclerosis patients. Each protocol was evaluated against histopathological confirmation.
Sourcetable's multi-test comparison feature revealed that the AI-assisted protocol had significantly better sensitivity (p < 0.001) while maintaining comparable specificity, leading to its adoption as the new standard.
A public health organization needed to optimize cutoff values for a diabetes screening program using HbA1c levels. The goal was to maximize case detection while minimizing false positives.
Using Sourcetable's ROC analysis, they tested multiple cutoff values from 5.7% to 6.5% HbA1c. The optimal cutoff of 6.1% provided 91% sensitivity and 78% specificity, balancing detection rates with resource utilization for follow-up testing.
Validate new assays, compare analytical methods, and establish reference ranges. Calculate analytical sensitivity and specificity for regulatory submissions.
Assess diagnostic accuracy of medical devices including imaging systems, point-of-care tests, and AI diagnostic tools.
Power calculations for diagnostic studies, interim analyses, and final statistical reporting for clinical trials and observational studies.
Monitor ongoing test performance, identify drift in analytical systems, and maintain quality control standards.
Optimize screening programs by analyzing test characteristics across different populations and risk groups.
Evaluate potential biomarkers for diagnostic utility, including combination biomarker panels and machine learning approaches.
Sourcetable supports comprehensive diagnostic test evaluation including sensitivity/specificity analysis, ROC curves with AUC calculation, likelihood ratios, predictive values, diagnostic odds ratios, and confidence intervals. We also provide multi-test comparisons with statistical significance testing.
Yes, Sourcetable handles paired test comparisons using McNemar's test and can analyze inter-rater agreement using kappa statistics. You can compare multiple diagnostic methods simultaneously and assess concordance between different evaluators.
Sourcetable provides multiple approaches for missing data including complete case analysis, multiple imputation, and sensitivity analyses. The AI assistant recommends the most appropriate method based on your data pattern and study design.
Absolutely. Sourcetable generates comprehensive statistical reports with all required metrics, confidence intervals, and visualizations that meet FDA and other regulatory standards for diagnostic test validation studies.
Sample size requirements depend on your expected sensitivity/specificity and desired precision. Sourcetable includes power calculation tools to help determine adequate sample sizes before starting your study, and can perform post-hoc power analyses.
Sourcetable automatically calculates positive and negative likelihood ratios with clinical interpretation guides. Values >10 or <0.1 indicate strong diagnostic evidence, while values 2-10 or 0.1-0.5 provide moderate evidence. The AI assistant provides context-specific interpretations.
If you question is not covered here, you can contact our team.
Contact Us